Re: XKCD Comic

Posted by Ben Darthjoy <ben.darthjoy-at-gmail.com> on 30 June 2012 | 0 Comments

On 30/06/2012 16:11, Clinton Gardiner wrote:
> I don't think I would bother arguing about a couple. I might dispute his
> definition of several though. I would put it as around seven. Not two to
> five.

At school, I was taught a *f*ew = *f*our or *f*ive, and *s*everal =
*s*ix or *s*even. So you had one, a couple, two or three, a few, several
and many. Totally arbitrary, of course, but seems to work.

Ben

--
Mates' rates available for photography ...